• Dark Tourism 01
  • Dark Tourism 02
  • Dark Tourism 03
  • Dark Tourism 04
  • Dark Tourism 05
  • Dark Tourism 06
  • Dark Tourism 07
  • Dark Tourism 08
  • Dark Tourism 09
  • Dark Tourism 10
  • Dark Tourism 11
  • Dark Tourism 12
  • Dark Tourism 13
  • Dark Tourism 14
  • Dark Tourism 15
  • Dark Tourism 16
  • Dark Tourism 17
  • Dark Tourism 18
  • Dark Tourism 19
  • Dark Tourism 20
  • Dark Tourism 21
  • Dark Tourism 22
  • Dark Tourism 23
  • Dark Tourism 24
  • Dark Tourism 25
  • Dark Tourism 26
  • Dark Tourism 27
  • DT028

Belfast, Oswiecim and Phnom Penh are separated by over 6000 miles, but are inextricably linked – first by war and most recently, tourism.

A complex political climate led Northern Ireland into a conflict that spanned more than 30 years, with Belfast at the heart of this dispute.

Poland was invaded by Nazi Germany in 1939, which precipitated the onset of World War II. The small town of Oswiecim seems insignificant until you hear the German translation: Auschwitz. The concentration camps here were the sites of one of the worst cases of genocide in recorded history.

In 1975, the Khmer Rouge, an extreme nationalistic, communist regime, stormed Cambodia’s capitol Phnom Penh, proceeding to systematically kill almost one third of the country’s population, bringing Cambodia, to its knees.

The visiting of sites where an atrocity, death or terror has occurred has led to the recent growth in the travel industry of what has become known as dark tourism. This is by no means a new phenomenon – interest in death and public spectacle has been apparent since the Middle Ages. However, over the last 10 years, more and more locations are becoming popular with tourists, and have found their way into guidebooks.

This body of work has currently explored three dark tourist sites located in Northern Ireland, Poland and Cambodia, but is ongoing. It begins to investigate reasons behind this fascination and looks at how people interact with these spaces and examines the role of ‘the tourist’.

Dark tourism in itself is a paradox, it is a place in which history and modernity sit hand in hand and in some locations, tourists relax in the grounds where thousands of people lost their lives. These locations are an important testament to the failure of humanity and if managed well, people can learn a great deal; but where is the line drawn between education, commemoration and voyeurism?